Purpose
Preserve district continuity during WAN or upstream provider disruptions through disciplined escalation and communication workflows.
Current state
Registry evidence supports this as an active incident-driven workflow. Current practice emphasizes opening vendor tickets early when anomalies appear and maintaining a coherent incident narrative across investigation and recovery.
Next step
Publish the standard incident template, escalation ladder, and artifact-retention expectations for outage timelines and communications.
Interfaces
Inputs- vendor outage reports
- district monitoring observations
- field support reports
Outputs- incident updates
- stakeholder communications
- resolution timelines
Reality to Action trace
Reality IngestionNot in scope.
Canonical StorageNot in scope.
Automation EnginesNot in scope.
Human InterfacesNot in scope.
Operational AdoptionContributes in this stage.
Core workflow
TBD. Document the 5-10 steps that define the core workflow.
Data integrity and contracts
Source of truth rules
- Active vendor tickets and district incident notes are authoritative for outage status and timeline context.
- Communication updates should reflect current incident state and confidence level from active troubleshooting.
Safe handling
- Restrict incident artifacts to approved internal operators and leadership audiences.
- Preserve timeline integrity to support post-incident review and continuity improvement.
Operational notes
Reliability posture
Continuity-critical operational workflow; effectiveness depends on early escalation discipline and consistent incident narrative maintenance.
Observability
- vendor ticket timelines
- district incident notes
- stakeholder communication records
Security and privacy
Low direct privacy sensitivity, but operational incident records and escalation details are internal.
Dependencies
Upstream- vendor responsiveness
- district network visibility
- incident-operator availability
Downstream- site continuity planning
- leadership status updates
- post-incident review
Ownership
OwnersTechnology Services
UsersTechnology Services, district leadership, site operators
WAN Connectivity Incident Tracking and Communications
Operational Notes
- This is an incident-driven workflow, not a scheduled sync job.
- Operational pattern: open vendor tickets early when anomalies are detected, then maintain timeline continuity as evidence changes.
- Registry context notes that historical troubleshooting has included physical-layer and optics/interface causes, reinforcing the need for disciplined escalation and communication records.
Registry Alignment
- Registry context: former
INT-034 is no longer counted as a standalone integration in the BOUSD registry. - Registry clarified: Atlas keeps this as a real service-management workflow with district continuity impact rather than as an integration record.
- Validation gaps: formal incident template, escalation ladder, and centralized artifact-retention model remain to be documented.